Tech talk
Pensions Simplification - Finance Bill 2006 Changes - TT14/06
In our TechTalk TT11/06 we summarised a number of changes
which HMRC announced would be included in the Finance Bill
2006. HMRC has now published the content of a Schedule to
the Finance Bill which sets out these changes in more detail
together with further changes, some of which were announced
previously.
Pension Credit Member
The definition of a pension credit member is extended to include
an ex-spouse who dies before a pension sharing order can be
implemented. This change ensures that the ex-spouse is treated
as a member of the scheme and that death benefits can be paid
to her beneficiaries without falling liable to an unauthorised
payments charge.
Unauthorised Payments etc.
The Schedule closes a number of loopholes to ensure that the
rules relating to unauthorised payments, loanbacks and value
shifting apply to former members and former sponsoring employers
and also to persons connected to such members and employers.
Bridging Pensions
Some occupational schemes provide a temporary pension payable
from normal retirement date until state pension age, when
that pension will cease. The amount of this temporary pension
is normally equivalent to the State Retirement Pension. Whilst the Finance Act 2004 allows
for the payment of a bridging pension, the legislation is
too restrictive and difficult for schemes to administer as
it provides for the reduction in payment to be based on the
actual state pension in payment. It is possible for a member
to defer payment of the state pension which would result in
no reduction or to be entitled to and receive a pension less
than the full amount which would result in a lower than normal
reduction. Therefore, the proposal will allow for a reduction
in payment to be made irrespective of whether the member takes
the state pension at state retirement age, or receives a state
pension lower than the maximum.
There will be a limit to the maximum amount of reduction.
For contracted out schemes this will be the maximum basic
state pension and for contracted in schemes this will be twice
the basic state pension.
Pension Commencement Lump Sum
The Schedule removes an anomaly whereby the PCLS under a money
purchase scheme could be increased by purchasing a scheme
pension instead of a lifetime annuity. The amendment ensures
that the PCLS is limited to 25% of the fund value irrespective
of the vehicle used to pay the pension. An anti-avoidance
rule is introduced to prevent a money purchase scheme being
switched to defined benefit to avoid the effect of this change.
Refund of Excess Lump Sum
Currently where a member pays a contribution in a tax year
of more than the maximum amount that he can receive tax relief
on, he can claim a refund of the excess contribution during
the period ending on the 6th anniversary of the end of the
tax year in which the contribution was paid. For example,
if a member pays a contribution greater than the tax relievable
amount in the 2006/07 tax year, the member will be able to
claim a refund of the non tax relievable contribution up to
the 5th April 2013.
The refund is calculated by the formula RPC - MAR - ALS where
RPC is the amount of the relievable pension contribution paid
by (or on behalf of) the member in the tax year; MAR is the
maximum amount of relief available, and ALS is the total value
of any refund of excess contribution lump sum(s) previously
paid in respect of that tax year to the member.
The way that the legislation is currently worded, it is possible
that where contributions are paid under the 'relief at source'
basis, a member would receive a refund greater than the excess
amount. The 'relief at source' basis is where the member pays
the contribution net of basic rate tax. An example
may help highlight the problem. If a member earning £100,000
has paid a 'relief at source' contribution of £156,000
(equivalent to £200,000 gross) and claims a refund of
excess contribution, the formula would allow a refund of £100,000
(£200,000 - £100,000 - £0), This is greater
than the excess contribution paid by the member of £78,000
paid under 'relief at source'.
The proposal will change the refund basis for excess contributions
paid by 'relief at source', to remove from the calculation
the tax relief given in respect of the excess contribution.
Age 75 Lifetime Allowance Test
A new benefit crystallisation event will be introduced to
test a member's unsecured pension funds against the lifetime
allowance when he/she attains age 75. The amount to be tested
is the current fund value less the amount originally designated
as unsecured pension fund.
Migrant Member Relief
Migrant member relief allows UK tax relief for migrant workers
who come to the UK as existing members of overseas pension
schemes and continue to make contributions to their overseas
scheme whilst in the UK. One of the conditions for migrant
member relief is that the individual must have been a non-UK
resident when they joined the overseas scheme.
The Revenue is aware that the condition mentioned above would
cause a problem if an employer was taken over whilst an individual
was claiming migrant member relief. If the individual is forced
to join the new employer's scheme by 'block transfer' the
individual would be ineligible for migrant member relief.
Likewise if the employer closes down the existing pension
scheme and forces the employee to join a new pension scheme
the employee would be ineligible for migrant member relief.
The Revenue propose to include a regulation making power within
the Finance Bill 2006 to allow individuals in these situations
to retain migrant member relief.
Maximum Permitted Pension
The Revenue announced on the 8th August 2005 that a consequential
Order would be issued to ensure that lump sum rights are included
in the amounts that are transitionally protected from the
lifetime allowance charge. This will now be included in the
Finance Bill 2006.
The rules for calculating the maximum permitted pension are
based on the assumption that the tax free cash lump sum is
available by commuting part of the pension. However, not all schemes allow tax free cash
by commutation but instead provide tax free cash as a separate
benefit. For these schemes that provide tax free cash as a
separate benefit this benefit is not included in the maximum
permitted pension formula. A change will be introduced in
the Finance Bill 2006 to include tax free cash where this
is provided as a separate benefit.
Transitional Protection and Lump Sum Death Benefits
The rules governing Primary Protection will be amended to
extend protection to lump sum death benefits. Where an individual
who registers for Primary Protection dies his lifetime allowance
enhancement factor can be increased if
- a lump sum death benefit is paid
- the lump sum death benefits payable had he/she died on
5 April 2006 exceed the individual's protected pension rights
and
- the person recovering the lump sum notifies HMRC that
this provision should apply
This increased enhancement factor will increase the individual's
lifetime allowance to the amount of the lump sum death benefits
payable. Where any lump sum is exchanged for dependant's pension
that amount is excluded.
Where the pension scheme, other than an occupational scheme
with at least 20 members, secures the lump sum death benefit
under a life assurance policy the following conditions apply
- the policy paying the benefits is the one that was in
force on 5 April 2006 and
- no variations, including exercise of any options under
the policy, have been made to the policy
If the pension scheme is an occupational scheme the following
additional conditions apply
- the member dies in the service of the employer by whom
he/she was employed on 5 April 2006, or a connected employer,
and such service is continuous
- the employer participated in the scheme on 5 April 2006
and
- the individual has not become entitled to benefits from
the scheme prior to his/her death
The schedule also amends the rules relating to Enhanced Protection
where life cover is maintained by contributions paid to a
money purchase arrangement after 5 April 2006.
Schedule 36 of Finance Act 2004 provides that where a "relevant
contribution" is paid to a money purchase arrangement
after 5 April 2006 enhanced protection is lost.
The Finance Bill prescribes that contributions paid to a
money purchase arrangement will not be relevant contributions
if they are
- used to pay premiums under a term assurance policy effected
before 6 April 2006
- the policy cannot be surrendered and is not surrendered
between 5 April 2006 and the date of death, and
- the policy is not varied to increase the benefits or to
extend the term. Variation includes exercise of an option
under the policy
In addition contributions to a money purchase occupational
pension scheme will not be relevant contributions if
- they are paid by a sponsoring employer and
- they are paid solely to provide lump sum death benefits
which are defined benefits or cash balance benefits
A further amendment provides an alternative test where the
lump sum death benefit exceeds the "appropriate limit".
The new test is based on the greater of
- the value of the lump sum death benefits at 5 April 2006
increased by 5% per annum or RPI if greater and
- the benefit based on earnings prior to the date of death
(using the same definition of earnings as applied on 5 April
2006) subject to the "post commencement limit"
This amendment will apply if the person to whom a benefit
is paid notifies HMRC that he/she wishes to rely on this provision.
Minimum Pension Age
Individuals who have a right, at 5 April 2006, to retire before
the minimum pension age enjoy transitional protection provided
that they do not become re-employed by a sponsoring employer
of the same scheme. An amendment will allow re-employment
in certain circumstances, primarily
where the individual is not connected with the employer and
the taking of benefits does not form part of an arrangement
to avoid tax and National Insurance Contributions.
Comments
On the whole these changes are as announced previously. The
extension of protection for life cover under Primary Protection
was unexpected but no less welcome for that. HMRC appear to
have considered the implications of protection for life cover
in almost every scenario. The only omission appears to be
where an individual has a large lump sum death benefit but
inadequate pension provision. Such an individual could now
register for enhanced protection to protect his life cover
but he would be prohibited from making any pension contributions.
Ian Westwater - March
2006